Understanding rising caesarean section trends: relevance of inductions and prelabour obstetric interventions at term
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Papers
VOLUME: 3 ISSUE: 4
P: 286 - 291
December 2011

Understanding rising caesarean section trends: relevance of inductions and prelabour obstetric interventions at term

Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2011;3(4):286-291
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium
2. Study Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology, Brussels
3. Department of Physiology, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Aims

Single center 10-years audit on the relation between labour ward management and caesarean section rate, with special emphasis on the impact of reduced induction rate and the use of strict criteria for the diagnosis of onset of spontaneous labour and the indication for induction of labour.

Methods

Retrospective classification of all deliveries between 1st January 2001 and 31st December 2010 in Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk Belgium, into the 10- group classification according to Robson. Numbers and rate of caesarean sections were defined for primiparous and multiparous women in spontaneous labour (groups 1 and 3 respectively), after induced labour (groups 2 and 4 respectively), with caesarean scar uterus (group 5) or with other gestational com- plications (groups 6 to 10). For these groups, a 10-years evolution was evaluated.

Results

In a total of 19.675 deliveries, the overall caesarean section rate increased from 20% (380/1937) in 2001 to 25% (534/2121) in 2007 (p < 0.001), and decreased again to 20% in 2010 (415/2068) (p < 0.001). The increase of caesarean sections before 2007 was associated with an increase of inductions in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term from 28.5% (410/1437) in 2003 to 35.9% (551/1536) in 2006 (p < 0.001). The decrease of caesarean sections after 2007 occurred both in induced labours, as a direct consequence of rationalised reduction of induction rate, and in spontaneous labours, following introduction of strict criteria for diagnosis of labour. Despite a similar caesarean section rate of 20% in 2001 and 2010, the 6.6% (136/2068) repeat caesarean section rate in 2010 was higher than 4.2% (81/1937) in 2001 (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

This single centre audit illustrates that increased induction rate is associated with increased caesarean section rate. This evolution can be reverted through a rationalised management aiming for reduction of induced labours and improved diagnosis of labour.

Keywords:
Caesarean section rate, induction of labour, obstetric management, obstetrics