The socio-economical impact of intravenous (IV) versus subcutaneous (SC) administration of trastuzumab: future prospectives
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Perspective
VOLUME: 7 ISSUE: 3
P: 176 - 180
September 2015

The socio-economical impact of intravenous (IV) versus subcutaneous (SC) administration of trastuzumab: future prospectives

Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2015;7(3):176-180
1. Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp University Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic and Gynecological Oncology Unit, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Trastuzumab was the first targeted therapy for HER2 positive breast cancer. It has become the standard of care for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer since 2000 and in the adjuvant setting since 2006. Adjuvant it is given for a year and in patients with metastatic disease until progression. The standard mode of administration is intravenous. Recently a subcutaneous form has become available. A phase III study showed that there is no difference between the intravenous and subcutaneous form in terms of safety and efficacy. The patient’s preference however significantly favoured the subcutaneous form. It is estimated that the use of the SC form could contribute to a cost saving between 758 and 2576 euro per annual course. For Belgium alone this could mean an estimated saving of 1.4 to 4.6 million euros per year. The potential benefit of the SC administration for healthcare facilities could be further increased when applied in a LEAN working day-care chemotherapy unit. After reviewing the existing literature we suggest to further validate the potential financial impact of SC trastuzumab compared to the traditional IV form and to introduce a scientific proposal incorporating the benefits of this formulation in a LEAN working healthcare unit.

Keywords:
Breast cancer, economical savings, intravenous, subcutaneous, trastuzumab, LEAN