The revival of intrauterine insemination: evidence-based data have changed the Picture
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Editorial
VOLUME: 9 ISSUE: 3
P: 131 - 132
September 2017

The revival of intrauterine insemination: evidence-based data have changed the Picture

Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2017;9(3):131-132
1. Genk Institute for Fertility Technology, ZOL Hospitals, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
2. Hasselt University, Department of Physiology, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

According to a number of high quality studies intrauterine insemination (IUI) with homologous semen should be the first choice treatment in case of unexplained and moderate male factor subfertility. IVF and ICSI are clearly over-used in this selected group of infertile couples. The limited value of IUI in infertility treatment as mentioned in the 2013 NICE guidelines was surely a premature statement and should be adapted to the actual literature.

More evidence-based data are becoming available on different variables influencing the success rates after IUI. It can be expected that these findings may lead to a better understanding and use of IUI in the near future.

Keywords:
artificial insemination, assisted reproduction, intrauterine insemination, IUI, NICE guidelines, semen quality, unexplained infertility