The Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty treatment for apical prolapse: 3 years experience in a single centre setting
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Papers
VOLUME: 2 ISSUE: 1
P: 1 - 8
March 2010

The Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty treatment for apical prolapse: 3 years experience in a single centre setting

Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2010;2(1):1-8
1. Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
2. A.Z. Turnhout, Steenweg op Merksplas 44, 2300 Turnhout
3. Clinique Ste Anne-St Rémi, Bd Graindor 66, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
4. Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Aim: To assess the anatomic effectiveness and complications of the Posterior IVS technique for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse over a period of 3 years.

Methods:A retrospective, single-arm, non-comparative study involving routine, standardised, pre-operative assessment,surgery and follow-up care using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantifications score at 1, 2 and 3 years was performed.The Posterior IVS technique was performed in patients with a symptomatic grade 2 or greater prolapse of the apicalcompartment (i.e. point C and/or D 􀀀 -1). Concomitant prolapse procedures were allowed.

Results: Twenty-nine consecutive patients underwent a Posterior IVS suspension over a period of 2 years. Ninetypercent (26/29) of patients required a concomitant prolapse procedure (79% an anterior and 55% a posterior vaginalwall repair). No serious peroperative complications, bladder injuries or rectal perforations were encountered. Overall anatomicalsuccess rates (

Conclusion: Three years follow-up of the Posterior IVS yields a high anatomical failure and substantial surgicalreintervention rate.Key words: Pelvic organ prolapse, apical prolapse, surgery, mesh, Posterior IVS, infraccocygeal sacropexy.

Keywords:
Pelvic organ prolapse, apical prolapse, surgery, mesh, Posterior IVS, infraccocygeal sacropexy