Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Articles
VOLUME: 11 ISSUE: 4
P: 337 - 346
December 2019

Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review

Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2019;11(4):337-346
1. Jan Yperman Ziekenhuis Department Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Briekestraat 12, 8900 Ieper
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Background

To investigate if foetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) is useful in preventing foetal metabolic acidosis in labour when ST-analysis of the foetal ECG (STAN ® ) is already being used as a second line technique for intrapartum foetal monitoring with cardiotocography (CTG).

Design

Restricted systematic review.

Methods

Based on a literature search in July 2019, a restricted systematic review was performed. Studies comparing CTG+STAN ® +FBS with CTG+STAN ® , CTG+FBS or CTG only were included. Observational studies allowing FBS in addition to  STAN ® reporting the indications, results and neonatal outcomes were included as well.

Results

Five randomised controlled trials (RCT) and seven observational trials were analysed. Based on the analysis of data coming from one RCT, FBS identifies foetal acidosis in 9.9% when performed in specific situations. Similarly, in observational trials it was found that in up to 10% of cases where STAN ® registration was less reliable, FBS suggested foetal acidosis. However, there is no evidence that FBS in these cases was capable of preventing metabolic acidosis or its neurological consequences.

Conclusion

Based on the available literature, no recommendations in favour of combining FBS with STAN ® monitoring can be made.

Keywords:
foetal scalp blood sampling, ST-analysis, metabolic acidosis, intrapartum monitoring, labour, STAN ®